A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. In the case of a Chinese restaurant, the Defendant: (a) committed a disguised employment on a Chinese restaurant, using the fact that the business owner received money from the food delivery and received money; and (b) settled daily work after the completion of the daily work, and (c) had the intent to escape with the money collected and urbine.

From October 23, 2013, the Defendant was engaged in the delivery of food and the collection of food charges in the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, while serving as the delivery source.

Around 20:00 on October 23, 2013, the Defendant, at “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim, embezzled KRW 400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

In addition, from that time to January 1, 2014, the Defendant fleded with property equivalent to KRW 5,831,00,000, which was kept in the same business by the same method six times in total, as shown in the attached list of crimes, and embezzled them.

B. (1) From October 5, 2013, the Defendant was engaged in the business of delivery of food and the collection of food charges in “I restaurant” operated by the victim H in the Dae-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G, and the Defendant was engaged in the business of delivery of food and the collection of food charges while working as delivery personnel.

On October 15, 2013, the Defendant, at around 15:00, embezzled KRW 174,000 in cash and cash amounting to KRW 174,00 in cash, which is the victim’s possession, for the sake of the victim, while the Defendant had been in custody for the sake of the victim. The Defendant, without returning to the victim, escaped and embezzled KRW 1.3 million in cash at the market price of the victim’s possession.

(2) On October 8, 2013, the Defendant is operated by the victim L, who is in K in the same wartime-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong