The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 of the facts charged, followed by the inwing community service center located in the sapletlet of the window in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and then went out of the park with a 2-year-old satus.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as asking a person to ask him/her, such as by linking and managing a dog line, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care, thereby making the above opening freely returned.

During that period, the injured party B asked the pet dog owned by him to be killed, thereby resisting the Defendant, and satatat caused the injured party to buck down the victim's left buckbucks.

Ultimately, the Defendant, in breach of the above duty of care, sustained injury due to the victim’s teared buckbucks, requiring treatment for two weeks.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act. According to the written consent of agreement bound in the public trial records, it can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.