The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who owns or raises a fat dog, and is obligated not to inflict any danger and injury on another person’s life, body, etc. even if he/she owns or manages a dog, etc. using the dog, etc. without permission therefor.

Nevertheless, at around 8:30 on March 23, 2014, Jatat, which was owned and managed by the Defendant, held the arms of D(52 years of age) and carried out treatment for the number of days (nine days of hospitalization treatment period) on the left side of the body of the victim by asking the arms of D(52 years of age).

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is difficult to view that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to prove the facts charged to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

After the above case, E, a medical doctor who treated and treated D, responded to the investigation agency’s request for cooperation with regard to “whether the above wife is a wife by animals such as the dog,” that “it is considered to be a physical wife by animals such as dog,” but this court’s inquiry about “whether the above judgment was made by clarifying the parts of the D at the time,” was based on D’s statement, and it was not clear whether the wife was a wife by the dog or by other animals.”

B. On the other hand, as a professor of animal protection, F, who is employed as a professor of animal protection, is not only a general feature of the opening, but also a body immediately after physical transfer, based on the results of analysis on CCTV images marked with D and the satat, etc. before and after the occurrence of the case, and photographs marked with D and the above sat, etc.