logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.11.27 2017구단74996
직업능력개발훈련지원금부정수급에 따른 지
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The curriculum for improving the duties of taxi drivers of 6,94,00 won on April 8, 2014 through June 27, 2014 (6,94,00 won from April 28, 2014 to October 26, 2015 of the process for improving the duties of taxi drivers of 6,94,00 won from April 28, 2014 to June 27, 2014; the course for improving the duties of taxi drivers of 9,56,560 won from November 26, 2015 to January 1, 2016.

A. The Plaintiff, a company engaged in taxi passenger transport business, concluded an entrustment contract with A or B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “C”), a company recognized as an employee’s workplace skill development training course, as follows (hereinafter referred to as “instant training”). A or B, a company recognized as an employee’s workplace skill development training course, entered into an entrustment contract with the Plaintiff’s employees by means of remote training (hereinafter referred to as “instant training”).

The total amount of KRW 14,986,080, 113, 113, 6,328,000 on August 13, 2014, 206, 106, 106, 14,658,080 on the process of improving the duties of taxi drivers, on the date the number of persons completing the training course is registered, shall be 14,986,080,00 on February 24, 2016.

B. The Plaintiff applied for subsidies for training expenses to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea on the premise that the stated number of trainees (hereinafter “the instant trainees”) in the table below among the above trainees (hereinafter “the instant trainees”) had completed the instant training normally and met the standards for completion for payment of subsidies for postal remote training, and received subsidies for training expenses in total of KRW 14,986,080 from the said Corporation as follows.

C. On July 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on the ground that “this case trainees did not undergo the instant training and failed to meet the completion standards; (b) filed an application for subsidies for training expenses with the Human Resources Development Service of Korea; and (c) received the payment thereof”; (c) Article 55(2) of the former Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (amended by Act No. 13902, Jan. 27, 2016; hereinafter “Vocational Skills Development Act”); and (d) the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (hereinafter “Enforcement Rule of the

arrow