beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff, a company running a passenger transport business, entered into an entrustment contract with A or B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “C”), a company recognized as an employee’s workplace skill development training course, as follows: (a) vocational ability development training is conducted by means of remote training for employees belonging to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant training”; and (b) when a part of the training is referred, it is indicated as “first training, etc.” according to the sequences.
The number of trainees for the training period for the date of concluding the contract shall be 5: (a) the number of taxi workers on April 25, 2014; and (b) the number of taxi workers on April 30, 2014 through June 15, 2014; (c) 8,400,000 won on July 10, 2015; (d) the number of taxi drivers on July 16, 2015; (e) 9,498,640 won on September 16, 2015; (e) the number of taxi drivers on March 17, 2016; (e) the total number of taxi drivers on April 16, 201; (e) the number of taxi drivers on March 22, 2016 through May 21, 2016; and (e) the total number of taxi drivers on March 16, 2017; and (e) the number of taxi workers on March 28, 20.
B. The Plaintiff applied for subsidies for training expenses to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea on the premise that the stated number of trainees (hereinafter “the instant trainees”) in the table below among the above trainees (hereinafter “the instant trainees”) had completed the instant training in normal condition and met the standards for the payment of subsidies for postal remote training, and received subsidies for training expenses from the said Corporation in total of KRW 26,275,680 as follows.
C. On August 3, 2017, the Defendant was amended by Act No. 13902, Jan. 27, 2016 to the Plaintiff on the ground that “this case’s trainee did not complete the instant training in a normal condition, and did not meet the completion standards, and the Plaintiff applied for subsidies for training expenses to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea, and received them.”