beta
Text
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including any claims extended and added in the trial, shall be modified as follows:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. The facts under the basis of facts do not conflict between the parties, or which can be recognized by adding up the whole purport of the pleadings to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 29-1, 2, 30-2, 32, 33 and 46, or which are significant facts in this court.
C Forest land 65,752 square meters (hereinafter “C forest land before the division”) in Gangnam-gu, Gangwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City prior to the division was originally owned D. Of them, as to the share 19,835/65,752 in September 3, 1981 due to the sale and purchase on September 1, 1981, F on June 18, 1986, on the ground of the successful bid on April 30, 1986, the transfer registration was completed in the future of G on February 15, 1996 on November 27, 1995, each share transfer registration was completed in G (45,917/65,752 shares) and G (19,835/655/752 shares).
B. After the division, C forest was divided into C forest land of this case and H forest land of this case on June 23, 2005.
C. D Deceased on December 17, 2007, and at the time of death, the heir was the Plaintiff, J, and K, who was the wife, and the heir. On February 15, 2008, I died on February 15, 2008 and jointly succeeded to the property by the Plaintiff, J, and K.
On the other hand, G filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, J, and D seeking the implementation of the procedure for ownership transfer registration for each of the shares of 1/3 shares of the instant H, among the shares of 45,917/65,752 shares in C, as the monthly support of the Chuncheon District Court 2010dan526, G against the Plaintiff, J, and D, as the co-ownership share ratio, and D agreed to separately own the instant H forest, and the instant H forest.
G received a favorable judgment in the court of first instance. Only the plaintiff filed an appeal against the above judgment, and the above court in Chuncheon District Court 201Na1884, the appellate court, revoked the part against the plaintiff in the judgment of first instance, dismissed the claim against the plaintiff in G, and the above judgment dismissed the appeal by the Supreme Court.