Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The 65,752 square meters of C forest land in Yeongdeungpo-gun, Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City before division (hereinafter “C forest land before division”) was owned by D. Of them, with respect to the share 19,835/65,752 in September 1, 1981, the cause of the sale was the same month.
3. E, in the future, on April 30, 1986, the same year due to a successful bid.
6. The transfer registration of each share was completed on February 15, 1996 due to the sale and purchase on November 27, 1995, and D and G were co-owned.
B. On June 23, 2005, C forest land was divided into 45,917 square meters of C forest land in Yeongdeungpo-gun, Gangwon-do (hereinafter “instant C forest”) and 19,835 square meters of H forest land in Yeongdeungpo-gun, Gangwon-do (hereinafter “instant H forest”).
C. D Deceased on December 17, 2007, and at the time of death, the heir was the Plaintiff, J, and K, who was the wife, and the heir. On February 15, 2008, I died on February 15, 2008, and jointly succeeded to the property by the Plaintiff, J, and K.
On the other hand, with respect to the Plaintiff, J, and K, that “G divided the forest land of this case before the division into shares of each owner, and D agreed to own the forest of this case independently. Since the Plaintiff succeeded to 1/3 of D’s property after D’s death, the Plaintiff, J, and K had a duty to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for each of 1/3 shares out of 45,917/65,752 shares out of the H forest of this case, on June 23, 2005, by filing a lawsuit for ownership transfer registration with the Chuncheon District Court’s Yeongdeungpo Branch Branch support for the land of this case, which was rendered a favorable judgment.”
(Y) On November 11, 2011, the first instance court rendered a judgment dismissing G’s claim against G on the ground that it is difficult to recognize that there was an agreement for G by the appellate court on November 11, 201, only the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the above first instance judgment, and that there was an agreement for G’s claim against G (Scheon District Court 201Na1884), and the above judgment became final and conclusive by the Supreme Court as the dismissal of appeal.
E. Since the above judgment, D shares (45,917/65,752) among the H forest land in this case were to be held.