logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.04.28 2017고단1375
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On February 16, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon support, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 22, 2017.

[2017 Highest 1375] The Defendant, in collusion with B on October 24, 2016, concluded that “The victim D’s D operation in the Cheongong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, would work as a multi-party employee with the name of 3 million won in advance.”

However, even if the defendant and B receive the advance payment from the injured party, they did not have the intention or ability to work in the above multiple ways.

Nevertheless, the Defendant and B, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 3 million won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (G) account in the name of F in the name of F in the name of a F in light of around 11:36 of the same month from the victim.

[2017 Highest 1545]

1. On July 2, 2016, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay the victim KRW 4.5 million in advance to the Dack located in the former North Korea-U.K., the Defendant borrowed KRW 4,500,000 from the advance payment to the employee if the Defendant borrowed KRW 4,500,000 as an employee.”

However, in fact, the Defendant received money from the owner of multiple places of business on several occasions from the beginning of 2015 on the grounds of debt repayment, etc., but did not work as an employee, and went away from the main place of business as the Defendant promised to do so. At that time, the Defendant had already been liable for the debts exceeding KRW 10 million, and the liability has been continuously increased. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to use the money as an employee or return the money equivalent to the above in advance as agreed with the victim.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is 50,000 won by the new cooperation account in the name of the defendant on the same day under the pretext of advance payment from the victim.

arrow