Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for three months.

However, it is against the Defendants for a period of one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 26, 2016, Defendant A would give the victim the victim “ from the multilateral bank above to the employee at his/her own discretion to give him/her a good preference.”

In addition, it was said that his/her father and wife lent KRW 300,000 to the school travel.

However, the Defendant, at the time, was liable to pay the amount equivalent to KRW 20 million and the amount of the Defendant’s obligation to pay the amount in advance to the other side owners, and was paid with the amount that the Defendant received from the injured party to pay the amount in advance to the other side owners. In addition, the Defendant, who received the amount in advance from the other side owners, did not have any intent or ability to pay the amount in advance even if receiving the amount in advance or the amount of the loan from the injured party, did not have any intent or ability to pay the said amount.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received money from the victim to the national bank account (number G) in the name of F in advance from the victim, from the victim, and acquired money from the victim to the third party on May 26, 2016, KRW 1 million on May 31, 2016, KRW 1 million on May 31, 2016, and KRW 300,000 on May 26, 2016.

2. On June 29, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for six months for fraud in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on November 29, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 4, 2016.

On June 1, 2016, the Defendant, at the place specified in Paragraph 1, 2016, ordered the victim D to work as an employee at the above multilateral bank.

“.” The purport was “.

However, the Defendant, at the time, was liable to pay the amount of KRW 15 million and to pay the amount of money in advance to the other side owners. However, the Defendant thought that the Defendant paid the amount of money from the injured party to the other side with the amount of money that he received, and even if he received the amount from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the said amount of money as an employee of the said party or to pay the said amount.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such, and is on the same day from the victim.