Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 29, 2016.

1. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim B: (a) around August 23, 2012, the victim B’s “Divers” in the operation of the victim B located in Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun; and (b) through E, through which the Defendant introduced the Defendant to the victim, the Defendant stated to the effect that “the Defendant would work as an employee from the Jeju-do Dack as the employee.”

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to work as an employee even if he received money from the injured party under the pretext of the advance payment, because the Defendant had attempted to work as an employee, by making a false statement as if he had done an act against many amusement centers or multiple operators, without having received money under the pretext of the advance payment.

Nevertheless, on August 23, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2.4 million from the victim, under the name of the advance payment on August 23, 2012, and obtained KRW 2.4 million from the victim to the above E as the advance payment, and acquired KRW 4.8 million in total by receiving KRW 2.4 million from the above E around the 25th day of the same month and around the 27th day of the same month.

2. On July 1, 2014, the Defendant committed a crime against Victim F with the victim F, in the “H multilateral bank” of the victim F’s operation located in G in Dong-gu, Dong-nam, Dong-nam, G, the Defendant would be an employee from the side of the week to the victim.

The term “the remittance of the FFF to the Agricultural Cooperative account in I’s name” was called to the effect that the FFF would be more than one person and the FFF would be required to do work.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any other employee and had no intention or ability to work as an employee even if he received money from the injured party under the name of advance payment because he did not receive any money under the pretext of advance payment, by making a false statement as if he did to work against various entertainment centers or multi-median business owners at the time.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.