1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Criminal Complaint No. 1) The Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office in around 2003 to the effect that “the unsatisfies of names interfere with the Plaintiff’s Internet service by blocking and obstructing normal computer operation” (No. 63522, 2003; hereinafter “the first complaint”).

(2) The Prosecutor filed a complaint against the Plaintiff on the grounds that it is evident that the Defendant had no suspicion after investigating the instant case. The Prosecutor appealed and re-appealed against this case, but all dismissed. 2) The Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Prosecutor’s Office at the Changwon District Prosecutor’s Office, which issued a rejection and dismissal disposition regarding the instant first accusation case, with the intention of the Prosecutor who conducted a false investigation, to manipulate the instant case with the intention to commit a false criminal investigation (No. 20588, 2003; hereinafter “the second accusation”), and the Prosecutor dismissed it (hereinafter “the second accusation”).

3) Since the investigation prosecutor of the second accusation case committed an error in the investigation into the above second accusation case to the Jinwon District Prosecutors' Office, the Plaintiff filed a complaint requesting the above prosecutor to punish the above prosecutor (No. 178 of 2008 and hereinafter "third accusation"), the Plaintiff filed a complaint (hereinafter "third accusation").

(4) The Plaintiff filed a complaint with the head of the original District Prosecutors’ Office to the effect that the prosecutor in charge of the investigation of the third accusation case was punished (No. 16245, 209; hereinafter “fourth accusation”) and the prosecutor in charge of the investigation dismissed the complaint.

5) Meanwhile, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the public prosecutor in charge who dismissed the first accusation case with the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office (No. 63522, 2003). However, the said public prosecutor dismissed the complaint (hereinafter “Seoul Second Criminal Appeal case”). B. The Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor’s Office’s assistance in civil litigation 1) against the Republic of Korea is the main branch of the Changwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office.