1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, and Defendant C, jointly with Defendant B, KRW 20,000,000, and each of the above amounts is KRW 20,000,000.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant C are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on November 16, 1991, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant B were known from around 2003.

B. In the course of the complaint filed against the Plaintiff and Defendant C (1) since the end of 2009, the Plaintiff was suspected of having committed an unlawful act and the dispute occurred between Defendant B and the Defendants. Around July 2010, Defendant B filed a complaint against the Plaintiff due to bodily injury, assault, confinement, and Defendant C’s rape and confinement (hereinafter “the complaint against rape, etc. of this case”).

(2) On April 4, 2011, the Plaintiff and Defendant C drafted an explanatory note stating that “I will not contact the Plaintiff and Defendant C again without any contact with them. I will be subject to any punishment in the future.” On the same day, Defendant B withdrawn the complaint for rape, etc. of this case on the same day, and on April 8, 2011, written an explanatory note stating that “I swear that I will not find the Plaintiff and Defendant C without telephone.”

(3) On April 201, the Jinju District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a disposition not to institute a prosecution on the part of the Plaintiff’s bodily injury among the cases involving rape, etc. of this case; the suspension of indictment on the part of the Plaintiff; the conduct of assault; the conduct of rape by Defendant C; the conduct of rape by Defendant C was without the authority to institute a prosecution on the grounds of revocation of the complaint; and the conduct of confinement by the Plaintiff and Defendant C on the grounds of lack of evidence.

C. Progress of each criminal case against Defendant B

A. From 00:00 on December 26, 2009 to 10:00 on the side of the “Korea-do bridge” side of the “Sacheon-dong, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Defendant C parked, leading up to the driver’s seat of the vehicle assigned by Defendant C, one and one after the string of the knife, leaving the knife, respectively, with the knife-in tool, thereby impairing its utility.

B. Defendant B: (a) 23:30 on December 30, 2009.