logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.11.20 2013고단648
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 4, 2006, the defendant's wife F, who had received post-delivery care from the victim E, who is the father of the D Hospital located in Jinju-si and the doctor affiliated to the D Hospital located in Jinju-si, was subject to the above E's negligence, and filed a complaint against the above E by occupational injury and violation of the Medical Service Act against the above E, etc. on August 4, 2007.

1. Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection;

A. A. Around August 2012, the Defendant posted on the Defendant’s residence in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, a notice stating that “I, using a computer, 09:40 square meters on October 2, 2009, 65 years old at the time, ki, 173 degrees of male who has requested the head of Jinju-si to bring the case to the head of Jinju-si, and that I, by means of a photograph, she was at the end of Ninju-si and the head of Jinju-si, she was at the end of 17 years old, she was at the end of 09:40 square meters on October 2, 2007, she was at the end of Mamo-si’s place of residence.”

B. On September 20, 2012, at the same place as on September 20, 2012, the Defendant, using a computer, posted a notice stating that “The director of the regional hospital and the director of the Empi division of the D Hospital shall be subject to criminal punishment by the prosecutor,” and “the director of the regional hospital and the director of the Empi division of the D Hospital shall be subject to criminal punishment by the prosecutor. In any case with respect to D Hospital, the person who has followed the J in connection with D Hospital shall be subject to criminal punishment by the prosecutor at the regional office of the Changwon District Prosecutors’ Office around 09:40,000, October 2, 207, and the head of the branch office, who is in charge of the prosecutor by telephone, abused the prosecutor’s authority to the public prosecutor at the regional office, and at the time, the director of the D Hospital would have abused the doctor at the time and caused criminal punishment by the doctor at the regional office.”

C. The Defendant, at the same place on October 1, 2012, posted the Defendant’s tables using a computer at around 08:38.

arrow