logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.02.04 2014고합267
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강제추행)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who was a deader of the Victim C (Gain, Gain, 34 years old).

At around 13:00 on August 2010, the Defendant, at around 13:0 on the day of 2010, committed an indecent act by force against the victim by inserting his son who was living together with the Defendant at the apartment house located in the Asan-si where the Defendant and the victim resided, and after completing his son’s string, the victim who was seated in the living room.”

2. While the Defendant and the defense counsel argued that the victim at the above date and time stated that “There is only one son, female,” the victim was able to look at the victim’s shoulder by hand, there was no fact that the victim was her chest.

3. Determination

A. Direct evidence that corresponds to the fact that the defendant delivered the victim's chest as stated in the facts charged, there exist statements in the police of the victim and in this court. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, the victim's statement is difficult to believe as it is and there is no other evidence to acknowledge credibility.

It is not different even if the victim is suffering from the symptoms of livering long time.

Around June 2014, the victim made a statement to the effect that, at the one-time investigation by the police around June 2014, the defendant delivered only one finger of the victim, stored 50,000 won of the victim's chest in the boom, and again, the chest was stored in the part of the victim's chest, and that the victim got her her her son and her son at the home and her her son's son, and that the victim got her her son at the home and her her son's son. In the second investigation by the police around July 2014, the victim made a statement to the effect that the defendant got 50,00 won of her son and her son was her son's son.

On the contrary, the complaint filed by the victim around August 2014, including divorce, had the victim's chest and her her tum around 2010, and had two times more or more indecent acts.

arrow