Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 26, 2016: (a) around 23:15, the Defendant destroyed the property whose repair cost is unknown, such as, on the ground that the victim would not immediately drive a taxi after using E-si operated by the victim D (the age of 40) in front of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on the ground that the victim would not immediately drive the taxi.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes related to one taxi booms video CD and photographs on the part of taxi damage;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel regarding the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. Although the defendant tried to open a taxi, the defendant alleged that he did not have a cab. Thus, the victim D, who is a taxi engineer, has reported 112 to the effect that after the occurrence of the case, the passenger gets out of the vehicle and scam scams, and the victim D, who is a taxi engineer, reported 112 to the effect that scams and scams were scamscams, and the investigation agency consistently made statements to this court. Considering the photograph of the damaged part of the taxi immediately after the occurrence of the case, the part that appears to be scamscams in the front and rear scams, the result of the defendant's examination of the scambling image image image image image, the defendant's 2620 hours scambling and 25 hours scamscam.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel.