The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On February 20, 2019, the Defendant defamationd the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the fact that her husband and the victim C (here, 31 years of age) in the 7th floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul building were in the office where her husband and the victim C (here, her husband and her 31 years of age) had an improper sexual relationship with her husband and her husband and the victim (here, her husband and her son) were in the office where she had a sexual relationship with her husband and her her husband and her son. The husband and the victim (here, her husband and her her only her he she had a pene. The disclosure of the relationship between the width and her her her vere,

B. The Defendant assaulted the victim at the same time, at the same time and place as above, with the victim’s hand without participating in tampering, at one time, on the part of the victim.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Articles 307(1) and 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Articles 312(2) and 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on February 27, 2020 after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.