logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.02.10 2017고단29
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On November 5, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim on the second floor of the E public announcement source of the victim D’s operation in light of 01:20 on November 5, 2016, by demanding the victim to live less than the period agreed in the above public announcement source and return monthly rent for that period. The victim refused the victim during the dispute with the victim, and the victim rejected it, but the victim’s son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son

2. The Defendant’s insultd the Defendant, at around 02:00 on November 5, 2016, was in F in light of light name, and around G District, and the Defendant’s intent to voluntarily accompany the said District to the police station for a criminal offense set forth in paragraph 1, to the effect that he/she would have been in a direct investigation by the police station, and that many unspecified people, including D and H, were protected in the course of boarding the patrol vehicle at the seat of the police station. As such, whether the police officer I, who belongs to the said District, “I was in a light of weather bomb;”

Any crecing creping cresh cand, cred and shred

“I wish to read “” and, even if they were asked from the person who suffered damage, whether “I ambibly urgical urgical urgical urgy;”

Hahman or as soon as possible, expressed that the police officer’s victimJ belonging to the said district group “I ambien Ma”, and the police officer’s victimJ of the said district group “I ambien feas Mahnen Mahnhnnen

Natdo Madna Madna

In other words, the victims were openly insulting by referring to the “Isar son”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Each complaint filed by J and I;

1. Photographs: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in the form of a suspect DNA damage (the head of a sloping);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult), and the selection of each fine for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the defendant committed the instant crime within the repeated crime period, and the defendant was not identical or similar to that of the defendant, but has been led to confession and reflect by the defendant.

arrow