1. All appeals filed by the counterclaim Defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the counterclaim Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons why this Court should explain are as follows: “No. 2, 3, and No. 10, and No. 11 (including additional numbers)” are added to the evidence in the part of “the facts of recognition 1................................................... addition to adding the following judgments to the end of Article 3(b) of the first instance judgment, it is identical to the reasons for the first instance judgment, and thus, it is decided to accept

2. Furthermore, the phrase “an act of entering into a land transaction contract without obtaining permission” subject to punishment under Article 141 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (amended by Act No. 7459 of Mar. 31, 2005) refers to an act of entering into a contract with the contents of excluding or avoiding permission under Article 118(1) of the same Act from the beginning, and it does not constitute an act of entering into a contract with the premise of obtaining permission (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 94Do1878, Oct. 7, 1994; 94Do2091, Apr. 7, 1995; 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, and 4 of the same Act (including provisional numbers). In other words, each of the following circumstances, comprehensively considering the following circumstances:

2. Written consent to land use and a certificate of seal impression for H or I's portion of land use.

3. provide up to 31.

3. The remainder of the publication of a certificate of seal imprint issued by a seller after permission for land transaction shall be paid KRW 20,000 (20,000).

The phrase "the terms and conditions of the special agreement" are stated, and ② the counterclaim defendant prepared a land transaction permission application to the counterclaim, but the power of attorney of the counterclaim defendant is required to accept it instead.