A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 9. 10. 02:30 경 서울 강북구 B, 2 층에 있는 ‘C’ 주점 내에서 “ 손님이 돈을 내지 않고 때린다” 는 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 강북 경찰서 소속 경찰관 D에게 신분증을 제출하고 인적 사항을 조사 받는 과정에서 위 D가 들고 있던 자신의 신분증을 빼앗고, 위 D에게 달려들고, 이에 경찰관 E이 피고인을 현행 범인으로 체포하고 주점 밖으로 연행하자 입으로 위 E의 왼쪽 팔을 깨물고, 경찰관 F의 몸을 발로 수 회 걷어차고, 경찰관 G의 명치부분을 발로 찼다.

피고인은 계속해서 경찰서로 이송되던 중 순찰차 내에서 욕설을 하며 경찰관 F의 근무 복 상의에 침을 뱉고, 발로 경찰관 G의 팔을 수회 찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol in E, G, and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in Chapter Three of the video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act include the following: (a) the Defendant has been subject to punishment several times due to violent crimes, such as a fine, etc., around 2013 and around 2016; (b) the Defendant is deemed to have committed the instant crime under the influence of alcohol; (c) the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in a contingent manner under the influence of alcohol; and (d) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine; and (c) other circumstances and sentencing guidelines indicated in the records and changes theory of the instant case, including the fact that the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment.