logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.06.22 2018고단1164
공무집행방해
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 3, 2017, the Defendant 20:25, on the front day of the Defendant’s “C week” in the Defendant’s operation in Spocheon-si B, Spocheon-si, the Defendant 201, following the Defendant 2: (a) on the following day: (b) female customers in the said head-house were drunk, under the influence of alcohol, who were flicking with each other, and did not pay the alcohol value; and (c) on the other, the Defendant 201.

“The 112 reported to the effect that “.......”

While Defendant 1, who received the above 112 report, stated matters to be reported to the police officer E and F by the police officer assigned to the police officer assigned to the police officer of the Macheon Police Station D, who called for the above 112 report, the police officer respondeded to the complaint by the police officer, such as that the police officer does not properly accept the defendant's report but does not take advantage of the above non-indicted female guest, and was boarding the police officer on the top of the "net 11" patrol boat.

Although the Defendant received a demand from police officers to get off and off from the patrol vehicle, the Defendant continued to go off from the patrol vehicle during the patrol vehicle, and thereafter, the police officers failed to move the patrol vehicle by getting off and off the patrol vehicle to get off and off the patrol vehicle, and the police officers failed to move the patrol vehicle by getting out of the patrol vehicle to get off the patrol vehicle again, and the police officers failed to walk off the knee part of the patrol vehicle E, such as getting off and walked once.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Investigation reports and investigation reports and telephone communications;

1. A report on internal investigation (attaching images);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on screen photographs of the dynamic image closure, screen photographs at the scene of the incident, and the closure of CCTV screen pictures;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order is that the defendant refuses to leave the police station or takes a delivery to the patrol vehicle.

arrow