A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months and a fine of up to two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won.

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 522] The Defendant reported around 13:55 on May 17, 2018, 2018 to the effect that “the Defendant is a neighbor and a neighbor,” and that “the Defendant is a neighbor and a neighbor,” and 112 reported to the effect that he was “the Defendant is a neighbor and a neighbor,” and explained to the Defendant, the Defendant’s defect: (a) the police officer did not come back to the Defendant’s horse and continued to go back to the first floor; and (b) the Defendant’s name was “this son,” and the Defendant continued to go back to the police officer E.

“Chacking sound, and booming the arms and chests of the cryp E in his hand and booming the clothes.

Defendant 1 continued to stop boarding the patrol vehicle in order for the above police officers to be called to another place. Defendant 2 prevented the police officers from boarding the patrol vehicle by opening the door of the defective patrol vehicle to board the patrol vehicle. Defendant 2: (a) the police officers attempted to embark again; (b) opened the string door of the patrol vehicle to put the arms into the string door to board the patrol vehicle; and (c) opened the string door to the string door of the patrol vehicle E; and (d) opened the string door to the left hand hand hand of the above string.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

[2018 High Court 183] The defendant is a customer who visited H located in G at Mapopo-si, and the victim I ( South, 38 years old) is a store of the above business.

The defendant from March 28, 2018 to the same year.

3. up to 30. Along with the process of refunding the charging machine purchased at H at an insular place, the Defendant’s telephone (J) calls at least 80 times in the Defendant’s phone number, thereby obstructing the victim’s normal work at the said operating place from doing so, thereby obstructing the business by force.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 522]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement F of the police statement with respect to E;

1. Damage photographs, each cell phone video CD, each image to take a photograph, the 112 reported case processing table, the investigation report (as to the shot L statement).