logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.10.31 2013고단3264
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On May 7, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 4, 201.

1. Around 20:10 on August 17, 2013, the Defendant driven a C Scpe vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.222% without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 10km from the front of the loan north-dong of the members of Ansan-si to the front of the Hegsan-dong in front of the loan of the members of Ansan-si to the Hegsan-dong, and driving a Ccpe vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.22%.

2. On August 17, 2013, the Defendant of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), violation of the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents), and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Road Act”) led the roads in front of the Heung-gu Loaning Do Council member in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, to the front of the Heungnam-dong, the roads in front of the Heung-si, a

At the time, since it is night and in the night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving a person engaged in driving service with a thorough look at the boom and left and right, and operating a brake and steering gear accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting this, was under the influence of alcohol and was driven by the Defendant on the front side of the E-Poter cargo vehicle driving by the Defendant with the front side of the said vehicle driven by the victim D, who stops in the opposite line due to the negligence of driving the straight line by breaking the right side of the moving direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim by the part of the spawn part of the spawn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part and the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part of the spathn part

arrow