logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.12.08 2014고정3634
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 31, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to breach of trust, etc. by the Incheon District Court, which became final and conclusive on December 13, 2012, and was in possession of a copy of the victim B’s resident registration certificate, despite the absence of any delegation from the victim B, the Defendant did not have received any delegation from the victim B.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. From August 30, 201, around August 30, 2011, in the name of "D" in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the term "user name" column entered "B", "E" and "applicant" in the "resident registration number" column, and signed voluntarily on the name next to the name of "B".

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the “application form for entry” in B, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. On November 17, 2011, at the time of the establishment of the Ftel A 816, the installation contract “B” and “B” written in the “consumer name” column and “B” in the “consumer name” and signed voluntarily by the name of “B”.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a “establishment Certificate” in B, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. The Defendant, like the above-mentioned 1-A, presented the above “application form” to a staff under D’s name, who was unaware of the forgery in his name, and exercised it as if it were a document duly formed.

B. The Defendant, like the above-mentioned 1-B, presented the above “establishment Certificate” to H, a person in charge of G establishment, who is aware of the forgery at that place, as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry records, case search, and application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for each crime;

1. To treat concurrent crimes;

arrow