The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, the Defendant did not have any 2 to 3 times the victim’s chest part of his chest, and the Defendant’s act did not inflict any injury on the victim’s chest joints.

B. The lower court’s sentence (an amount of KRW 4 million) against an unfair defendant in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court can sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant inflicted an injury upon the victim in need of medical treatment for a period of 56 days prior to the enforcement of violence, as stated in the instant facts charged.

Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.

(1) From the investigation stage to the court of the court below, the victim stated that “the Defendant satisfeddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

It is objectively reasonable and reasonable to trust the defendant [the defendant was in a situation in which the defendant could not see the victim's reputation in light of the defendant and the victim's attitude and location.

The argument is asserted.

However, according to the consistent statement of the victim, the victim's statement is identical to the defendant even while the two cases are in progress. However, the defendant's fluencies, and the victim's fluencies, and the victim was still in progress, and the defendant was faced with the fluoral part in this case. Therefore, even if the defendant's above assertion was true, there is no problem in recognizing this part of the facts charged. Sheshe was given an emergency vehicle after the defendant left the victim's house, and was given medical treatment in the emergency room of the Korea National University Hospital in the same forest.