logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.03.06 2018고단8462
특수협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of ten months and a fine of three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the husband of a de facto marital relationship with the victim B (V, 56 years of age) and the ten-year-old marriage.

On June 23, 2018, the Defendant, at around 22:00, 22:00, coming from the victim’s house of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu C building D, the Defendant, without any own reason, called “packed the victim by width,” while carrying the time signal, which is a dangerous object in the kitchen ( approximately 15 cm in total length, approximately 7 cm in length), was placed in the kitchen, while putting the victim’s head into mind, and putting the victim’s head into drinking, etc., which would inflict any injury on the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

"2018 Highest 8639"

1. On June 2, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) from around 02:25 to around 02:55, the Defendant: (b) at the Busan Bupyeong-gu Busan Bupyeong-gu Police Station F box; (c) under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant imprisoned the Defendant at the government office with sound, such as “weetd with a police officer,” “weet this wn”, “public officials’ horses must be hicked, hicking, and hicking,” and avoided disturbance.

2. The victim G, who is a police officer who belongs to the above police box, proposed the Defendant to return home at the time and place specified in Paragraph (1) of the same Article, and issued several warnings to the Defendant who is the police officer to whom the above police box belongs, and continued to escape from the disturbance, but the police officer’s assaulted the Defendant, such as resisting the defect that the police officer attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, resisting the defect that the police officer attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and quihing the face of the police officer by hand.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning crime prevention and suppression of police officers, and at the same time, the victim G(39 years of age) needs to be treated for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each defendant's oral statement "2018 Highest 8462";

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Domestic violence, reports on emergency measures, and photographs;

arrow