Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by imprisonment for six months, and by a fine of five million won.

Defendant

B above.

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant B, on November 10, 2017, committed a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediating, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, at the Seoul Southern District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Southern District Court”), sentenced Defendant B to the suspension of the execution for 4 months and the suspension of the execution for 2 years, and became final and conclusive

[Criminal Facts]

1. Defendant A

A. From February 2015, an offender against the control around February 2017 operated “E” the trade name “E” on the five floors of the D D Building in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City from around February 2, 2015, Defendant B et al. employed Defendant B et al. to provide guidance to male customers who find out the place and located in the place of business by receiving KRW 40,000 to 45,000, and by allowing female employees employed in advance to look at the sexual organ of male customers and to look at the same, and arranging similarity in trade by allowing them to look at the sexual organ of male customers.

On February 3, 2017, when it was discovered that a similar trade was conducted by police officers belonging to the Seoul Central Police Station, C instructed Defendant B, who was at the scene, to "F, the owner of the F Office," and intended to allow F to attend the police on the ground that F was "the president of the F Office," but did not seem to have been engaged in the operation of the sexual traffic business, C, who was not at all engaged in the operation of the sexual traffic business.

C On February 2017, 2017, at the first place, Defendant A was subject to the control of ‘Grashing' by posting a phone call to Defendant A, and upon request of Defendant A, the sentence was changed as if the person engaged in the business, and thereafter Defendant A met or notified Defendant A of matters concerning the operation of the business through telephone or text message on several occasions, and in return, Defendant A was given a fine on behalf of Defendant A when a fine is imposed on Defendant A, and further KRW 3 million will be imposed.

In other words, when Defendant A investigated the police, Defendant A had a view to making a false confession.

Therefore, the defendant A is the same as the investigation of the Seoul Central Police Station and the G Team office around March 15, 2017.