Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A under the trade name of "C", a business owner operating a "non-afforc" and a "fforc" type of business that allows female employees to feel sexual intercourse with male customers in his/her entrance and hand, and Defendant B is a person who works for the office at each of the above businesses.

Defendant

A From November 1, 2017 to December 6, 2017, from the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 103, 205, and 301, the term "Kafin" (in the face of male customers) was used as the trade name "C", and the term "Ma" (i.e., the sexual organ of male customers) was used as the trade name "C" and the Internet site F, "G, etc." was advertised to engage in commercial sex acts, and the management of profits, and the management of customers' promise during the day when sexual traffic was committed.

Defendant

B around November 20, 2017, around December 2, 2017, from each of the above businesses to receive KRW 2.5 million per month from Defendant A, and made commercial sex acts advertisements, night-time reservation customers management, and female employees to commute to and from work.

During each of the above periods, the Defendants received 15 to 20 million won in cash per 15,000 to 65,000 won, and had employees H, I et al. enter the place where they received 65,000 won in cash for 15 to 2000,000 won, and had sexual intercourse with other similar sexual intercourses, such as having male customers feel sexual intercourse. In the case of “Min”, the Defendants received 60 to 110,000 won from the nameless customers and 150,000 won in 90,000 won in 1,000 won in 15 to 1,000 won in 1,000 won in 1,000 won in 20 to 1,000 won in 20 to 1,000 won in 200

Accordingly, Defendant A stated in the indictment from November 1, 2017 to December 6, 2017, and Defendant B as “ November 1, 2017.” However, in light of the records and the front line of the charges, it is obvious that Defendant A is a clerical error in the indictment from November 20, 2017.”

From around December 2, 2017 to around December 2, 2017, similar sexual intercourses are engaging in business in the above “C”.