logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.14 2017고합63
강간미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From July 2015 to August 2015, the Defendant maintained an internal relationship with the victim C (V, 29 years of age).

피고인은 2016. 말경 피해자와 헤어지면서 피해자 앞에서 피해자와의 성관계 장면이 촬영된 동영상을 삭제하는 시늉을 하였으나 사실은 동영상을 삭제하지 않고 계속 보관하고 있었다.

On December 22, 2016, when the victim was pregnant with the defendant on a sexual intercourse and performed a mid-term operation and avoided the defendant's meeting with the defendant. On January 31, 2017, the defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim and deleted the video of the handphone on the condition that he would delete the video on the condition that he would remove the video. However, the fact was kept separately.

When the victim forced the defendant to communicate with the police by using the above sexually related video images, the victim was willing to report the defendant to the police as an illegal staying person, etc. on February 10, 2017. On February 10, 2017, the victim asked the defendant to report the defendant to the police by illegal staying person, etc., and contacted the defendant as the victim's house.

From 10:30 on the same day to 11:00 on the same day as the house of the victim, the defendant was in contact with the victim, and the body of the victim was met from 10:30 on the same day to 11:00 on the living room of the victim located in Gwangju North-gu to 2 his/her

In order for a victim to have a victim injured the defendant, he was able to leave the victim's body with the victim's hand, boomed the victim's body with the victim's hand, divided the victim's bridge with a single bridge, and prevented the victim from leaving the victim's body, and tried to suppress the victim's resistance and sexual intercourse with the victim. However, the police officer dispatched upon receipt of the report did not have the intent to keep the victim's body in the wind, but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part concerning C confrontations of the interrogation protocol of the suspect to the defendant two times;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

arrow