beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and by a fine of one million won.
Defendant
B does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendants were sponsed with each other, and the victim D (V, 51) was a person who was in an internal relationship with Defendant A.
1. Defendant A did not contact with the Defendant, and had the Defendant kept in custody with the Defendant’s sexual intercourse images to threaten the victim.
A. On November 26, 2016, from around 04:15 to the same day 04:30 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) using a mobile phone from the victim’s cell phone to “I have known of the fact that I would have disclosed the dynamic image; (b) I would have known of what I would have become impule and do;”; (c) “I would have to have you shared”; (d) “I would have received a telephone; and (c) I
“.......” sent Kakao Stockholm letters
The above sexually related video was threatened with the victim as if it were disclosed through the Internet.
B. On December 22, 2016, from around 19:11 to around 19:35 on the same day, the Defendant sent a sexually related video with the victim to the victim using the Kakakao Stockholm, and then sent the victim’s sexually related dynamics to the victim, “Isk for sharing” and “Isk for phone call with the victim.”
At the same time, the victim spreads the sexually related video of the victim via the Internet, or threatened the victim's children as if they were known.
2. Defendant B, who is dissatisfied with the above problem A by using a sexually related video image between the victim and his cell phone message, had a strong appraisal, and had a mind to threaten the victim by using the same as a sexually related video.
Accordingly, on April 4, 2017, the Defendant sent a sexually connected video, etc. between the victim and A using mobile phone camera Stockholm around 03:28 on April 4, 2017 to the victim, and then notified that “D may be identified before the phone number” and “10 sold to the lower part of the year 18 and sold to the Defendant.”
“..................................................”
The victim threatened the victim's sexual intercourse video as if he/she were informed of the victim's child.
Summary of Evidence
1..