A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 16, 2013, at around 01:40, the Defendant attempted to steal one cell phone owned by the victim under the victim’s right blue blue, located in C, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and then failed to achieve the intent of the theft.

2. Violation of the Resident Registration Act.

A. The Defendant, at the time and place indicated in Paragraph 1, received a flagrant offender f in charge of attempted larceny with the Estation of the Namyang Police Station Estation assistant F, and the name asked by F to confirm the Defendant’s personal information is G, and the resident registration number was stated as H, and used unlawfully the type G’s resident registration number.

B. At around 03:30 on the same day, the Defendant used the Defendant’s resident registration number unlawfully by making a statement that the police officer in charge is G and the resident registration number is H in the process of receiving an interrogation protocol at the I Team of the Namyang Police Station 20-15, the same day.

3. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. The Defendant signed “G” on the written statement prepared by the Defendant as if the Defendant was a dead G with the intent to exercise at the time and place specified in Article 2-2(b), and forged the signature of G with a seal affixed, and submitted the said written statement with a signature written by the forged G to the J, a police officer in charge of the aforesaid written statement.

B. The Defendant was investigated as a suspect for the purpose of exercising the date and time stated in Paragraph 2(b) and at the place, signed as G in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol, and forged G’s signature, and exercised the forged private signature by issuing the suspect interrogation protocol stating the forged G’s signature to the J, a police officer in charge of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of the written acceptance of flagrant offender in the name of G, a written statement in the name of G, and statutes governing the police interrogation protocol in the name of G;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;