logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.12.29 2014고단2060
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for three months.

However, from the final date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In this case, “2014 Highest 2060”- G was prosecuted as co-defendant with the Defendant in the instant case, but the pleadings were separated by being temporarily absent while the trial was in progress, and as of the date of the instant sentence, the judgment with respect to the said G was estimated.

On July 4, 2013, the defendant A and the defendant A's joint criminal conduct (criminal records) were sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Seoul Western District Court on July 4, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 15, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A, along with G on April 208, 2008, Hsch Rexroths car and I Ssch Rexroths car owned by G, are vehicles with no knowledge of the true legal relationship acquired at the horse race tracks, and in the case of the above Bosch Rexroths car, the vehicle with a mortgage held by the KJ for the purpose of offering money to others by offering the said vehicle as security and presenting a false loan certificate, even though it is well aware that the payment for the installment secured by the KJ for the loan is not paid in full.

Accordingly, on April 2008, G asked K, a police officer of the early 2008, to submit a loan certificate in the name of 4 in order to borrow money with two vehicles as collateral. There is no problem to immediately repay the borrowed money, and after obtaining consent from K, G prepares a loan certificate stating that “8 million won shall be borrowed and repaid until May 10, 2008 in the name of the above K,” and the Defendant asks L, a loan broker, to the effect that “K intends to borrow money.” There is a loan certificate prepared by K, and two vehicles owned by K as collateral.”

Accordingly, Defendant A and G have L who did not know about the authenticity of the legal relationship of the vehicle to be provided as security for the loan certificate or loan certificate in Gangnam-gu Seoul around 10:00 on April 10, 2008 and call the victim E in Gangnam-gu to get money.

arrow