logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.05.31 2017고단5420
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 5420]

1. The Defendant: (a) provided a car owned by the rental car company prepared by C or D as security to the victim E and conspired with C or D to borrow money through a flat monetary transaction with the Defendant and the victim E.

On June 17, 2017, the Defendant is required to pay funds to the victim in the 240 (Saeng-dong Pail-ro, Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City in order to make a siren from the side of the Dlure-gun.

QM6 Vehicles and their franchises to be entrusted with HG vehicles as security, and they will be used and repaid only one month.

"......... F passenger cars ( QM6) and G passenger cars (HG) held by D and C were offered to the victim as collateral and prepared a loan certificate under the name of the Defendant.

On July 19, 2017, the Defendant and C continue to lend money to the victim in the I coffee shop located in Seo-gu in Gwangju, Seo-gu, Seoul to lend the money to the victim for the loan of the existing bond-backed vehicle with a Bosch Rexroth vehicle.

Bosch Rexroth vehicles are the vehicles of J's place of business, and D has no problem as a J's employee.

J is not enough to establish a single automobile rental business office more.

It is intended to use and return only one month when it lends money with the vehicle as collateral.

The establishment of a place of business refers to the purport that the money is to be repaid in gold, and the registration vehicle L(Sex) and the registration vehicle M(AD7) vehicle M(AD7) car prepared by D, which is registered in the Kene car corporation, provided two automobiles as collateral to the victim, and re-written a loan certificate under the name of the defendant.

However, the automobiles offered as security by the defendant et al. do not have the right to use them as security for the vehicles that D temporarily borrow from the Lenek Company or illegally circulated one-day large lane, and the defendant et al. do not have the right to obtain a legitimate security right, and even if they borrow money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to pay it.

arrow