The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, one year of additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has a favorable condition that the defendant led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake. However, the defendant was sentenced to six times or more to imprisonment for the same crime on July 12, 2012, and committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period after the execution of the sentence was completed on December 20, 2012, with prison labor for the crime of violating the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., at the port support of the Daegu District Court, Daegu District Court: on December 12, 2012, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period; on two occasions, the defendant was not only administered phiphones but also taken up for the sale and provision of phiphones; on the other hand, the nature of the crime is not good; on the grounds that the court below's recommendation [basic crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics due to the purchase and sale of phiphones: Violation of the former Act due to the provision of phiphones: Violation of imprisonment with prison labor for each term of one year or six years.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.