The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, one year of additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination: The Defendant committed each of the crimes in this case during the repeated period after the execution of the punishment was completed on October 3, 201, which was sentenced to ten times or more as a crime of violating the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., at the Daegu District Court on December 7, 2010, which committed each of the crimes in this case; the Defendant received phiphones and received two times, and arranged the purchase and sale of phiphones; the nature of the crimes is not good; the Defendant was recommended [basic crime of this case: the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence): the punishment of violating the former Act by arranging the purchase and sale of phiphones; the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime on December 7, 2010; the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.; the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a minimum of one year or more; the Defendant’s imprisonment with prison labor for a prison term of one year or more;

Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.