The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment, one year of collection by additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination of the facts that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in favor of him/her while making a confession of each of the crimes of this case, but the defendant has been punished twice for the same crime, and on April 20, 201, at the Daegu District Court sentenced ten months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. on August 19, 201, and committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period after the execution of the punishment was completed. The defendant in collusion with C, purchased phiphones and administered phiphones, etc., which are not good quality of the crime. In applying the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court on the narcotics crime of this case, the court below evaluated the purchase and sale of the defendant as one of the purchase acts of this case, and assessed the types of recommended punishment [basic crime: Violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. due to purchase and sale of phiphones, violation of the age limit of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of this case, violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.