Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.
However, against Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B Co., Ltd. (the representative director A, D Co., Ltd. on December 30, 2014) is a corporation established for the purpose of civil engineering work business, etc. on the second and second floor E in Jeju, and the defendant A has overall control over the operation of the above company as the representative director of the above company, and no person shall lend another person's career certificate of construction technology.
1. Defendant A
A. The Defendant in violation of the Construction Technology Promotion Act borrowed 10 construction engineers career certificates (issuance number G) from November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2016, on the condition that 4 insurance premiums and rental fees are paid to F, who is located in B’s office from July 1, 2013 to September 30, 2016, as indicated in the attached Table of Crimes, from around November 2012 to around October 31, 2016.
B. Around July 31, 2013, the Defendant merely borrowed a construction technology qualification certificate as seen above, and even if construction technicians H falsely prepared a benefit ledger, etc. and kept funds of KRW 1,017,130 for the victimized company, as if he/she was an employee actually working in the injured company B, the Defendant transferred KRW 1,017,130 to the H Nonghyup Bank’s account under the name of benefit, and the Defendant was kept in custody on the same day.
He withdrawn all the above amount in cash using passbook and seal, and again deposited it into the account in the name of the defendant, and used it for personal purposes, such as living expenses, etc. around that time from around September 30, 2016 to around September 30, 2016, 357,59,089 won was consumed in total for personal purposes, such as living expenses, by pretending the payment of wages to 10 construction engineers who borrowed a construction technology qualification certificate through the above method, over 43 times in total.
Accordingly, the Defendant arbitrarily consumed and embezzled the money that he kept on duty for the victim.
2. The defendant.