Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. No technology technician for construction shall allow another person to perform construction works or construction technology services in his/her name or lend his/her certificate of work experience to another person;

Nevertheless, from May 7, 2014 to April 14, 2015, the Defendant lent his/her career certificate (e.g., elementary level technology in the civil engineering sector) to E in the Sinyoung-si ( state) through G, Gyeong-nam.

2. No technician for construction of a defendant A shall allow another person to perform construction works or construction technology services in his/her name or lend his/her certificate of work experience to another person, and no one shall arrange such acts;

Nevertheless, from May 7, 2014 to April 14, 2015, the Defendant arranged to use the construction technology experience in G Co., Ltd. in G Co., Ltd. in G Co., Ltd. located in F in Jinnam-si, and (State) E Co., Ltd. in E Co., Ltd. to H Corporation in Tong Young-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A legal statement of a witness;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements of the A and to recognize suspicion of recording and good offices);

1. The filing of an accusation, the notification related to the extension of career records of construction technicians, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing career certificates of construction technicians;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Articles 89 subparag. 3 (c) and 23 of the Construction Technology Promotion Act, and selection of fines;

B. Defendant B: Articles 89 subparag. 3 (a) and 23 of the Construction Technology Promotion Act, and selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant B and his defense counsel’s assertion against Defendant B of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and his defense counsel are asserted to the effect that they did not lend a construction technology career certificate. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., A, the court.