logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단3667
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Facts charged;

A. On September 24, 2012, the Defendant, at a place not known around September 24, 2012, owned 10,000 square meters of land adjoining the Red Sea Building, which was in the original form of the construction of the relevant golf course, by the victim C, at a place where it is not known around September 24, 2012.

The problem of casino license and license is that the LAF is required to be repaid within three months, and 2% of the shares of the casino will be paid.

‘Falsely speaks to the effect that it is called’.

However, the defendant did not have any special property in the state of being registered as a bad credit holder, and even if he received money from others because there is no fixed income, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it until the agreed date.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 16 million won to the national bank account (F) in the name of E under the pretext of borrowing from the victim.

B. The Defendant, on October 31, 2012, committed fraud, around October 31, 2012, has the Plaintiff’s total sales right within the “H coffee shop” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G around October 31, 2012, with the Plaintiff’s total sales right for dry C&C.

In concluding a supply contract with the Ministry of National Defense, the company loans money to make the goods packaging expenses and finished goods, and the space and the office urgently needed. The company provides multi-family housing in the name of the wife (I) as security, and pays it within one month.

‘Falsely speaks to the effect that it is called’.

However, the defendant did not have any special property in the state of being registered as a bad credit holder, and even if he received money from others because there is no fixed income, he did not have the intention or ability to pay it until the agreed date.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 20 million to the corporate bank account (K) in the name of J as the borrowed money from the victim.

2. Determination:

A. On September 24, 2012, the victim who was directly proved to the above facts charged and submitted by the prosecution.

arrow