logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2016.04.21 2016고단119
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 9, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 8 months with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution at the Chuncheon District Court for fraud, and such judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 14, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “The Defendant would have repaid the amount of money in KRW 3 million to the victim D, and would have paid it in three copies of interest.”

However, the defendant was registered as the bad credit standing in 2006 and did not have any property, and the debt of financial institution loans was paid in KRW 20 million, and even if he did not borrow money from the injured party due to no income at that time, there was no intention or ability to pay the interest and principal normally.

As such, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received a cash of KRW 3 million from the victim on the pretext of borrowing money from the victim; and (c) received a total of KRW 7 million over three times from around that time to July 21, 201, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. On July 21, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, “Around the point of Hongcheon-gu, Hongcheon-ro, Hongcheon-ro, Hongcheon-ro, Hongcheon-ro, 10-1, the Defendant would have repaid the amount to KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).”

However, the defendant was registered as the bad credit standing in 2006 and did not have any property, and the debt of financial institution loans was paid in KRW 20 million, and even if he did not borrow money from the injured party due to no income at that time, there was no intention or ability to pay the interest and principal normally.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim, i.e., a limit of KRW 10 million from the victim’s name, and subsequently withdrawn the full amount of KRW 10 million from around that time to August 25, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.With respect to D, F.

arrow