logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고단8637
점유이탈물횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 8637"

1. On March 17, 2014, the Defendant embezzled the victim’s gallon-based mobile phone valueing to 700,000 won per gallon-based mobile phone valueing to 70,000 won per gallon-based mobile phone valueing to 60,000 won per gallon-based mobile phone valueing to 760,000 won, and one gallon-based mobile phone valueing to 760,000 won, without following necessary procedures, such as acquiring the victim’s gallon-based market valueing to 17:30,000 won, and returning it to the victim.

2. At around 17:50 on March 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) connected the victim D’s mobile phone from the subway prior to the subway prior to the Incheon Metropolitan City direction-1; (b) paid three copies of 20,000 won for the KS online service; and (c) continuously paid 440,000 won for the game capital through the KSV mobile phone game display case at around 18:05 on the same day, the Defendant paid 440,000 won for the game capital through the Internet and other information processing devices without authority; and (d) obtained a total of 500,000,000 won for the information processing by inputting the information without authority into the information processing devices, such as the computer.

"2014 Highest 9500"

1. Around April 15, 2013, the Defendant, at the “F office” in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, without the consent of his/her guardian, and despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay mobile phone charges, etc., the Defendant: (a) false statement is made to the operator G with the consent of H that his/her mother would purchase a mobile phone with the consent of H and faithfully pay the user fees, etc.; (b) such false statement was made that the victim G would have faithfully paid the user fees, etc.; and (c) the victim would have received the amount equivalent to 850,000 won from the victim’

After that, the Defendant cancelled her dog because her mother did not submit his/her identification card on April 26, 2013.

arrow