A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, even though he did not obtain C’s identification card and the consent of C in order to open a Handphone in the name of C, was issued with a credit card under his name, and used it to pay the price and received cash service from the cash automatic machine.

1. On March 2014, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document, using a black camera on the paper for the application form for membership registration received from D by the Korean card recruitment designer D, who visited the Republic of Korea for the purpose of uttering at the office of the Nice Doksan, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of uttering at the office of the Nice Doksan Agricultural Association (707-1), and signed the name of C in the name column, “C”, “E”, “F 104 of Gangnam-gu, Seoul,” and “G” in the cell phone number column, “G”, “Y” in the workplace name column,” “Yansansan Agricultural Association Co., Ltd., and the workplace address column”, and “workplace” and “C” in the card receipt request column, and signed on the name side.

Accordingly, the defendant forged a copy of the application for membership of the Korean card in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above “paragraph 1,” had H, a workplace partner at the same time and place as above, display the application for membership registration of a forged card, as in the above Paragraph 1, to the said D, as if it were a document duly formed.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same time and place as the above “paragraph (1)”, had the victim Korean card Co., Ltd. present one copy of the application for membership of the forged Korean card, as in the above “paragraph (1), to the above H, which is similar to C and appearance, and had H engage as if it were C, and had a legitimate authority to apply for the issuance of a credit card by the female.

The defendant belongs to this.