logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.10.29 2014가합5539
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 56,885,58 as well as its 5% per annum from October 23, 2013 to October 29, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is the E Hospital located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(1) The Plaintiff is a doctor operating the instant procedure. The Plaintiff is a doctor operating the instant procedure from the Defendant to the following port (hereinafter referred to as “instant procedure”).

(2) On January 5, 2015, the Defendant and C, who became a joint administrator, as the Seoul Central District Court rendered a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures in accordance with the Seoul Central District Court Order 2014dan100168, have received the lawsuit against the Defendant.

However, on April 17, 2015 with respect to the above rehabilitation case, the decision to discontinue the rehabilitation procedures was made on April 17, 2015, and the defendant again proceeded with the litigation procedure on May 18, 2015.

B. On October 14, 2013, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized in the instant surgery from the Defendant, to undergo a re-operation by the Defendant on the dummy Tuk, the panty panty of the pande part of the clothes, the local inhalement of the clothes and the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the pande part of the moli part of the pane part of the mos. (2) After the said surgery, the Plaintiff confirmed that her her her her her sen

3) 원고는 2013. 10. 21. 2차 유륜 축소술을 받으면서 상완 지방흡입술도 함께 받았고, 2013. 10. 23. 상완 지방흡입술을 추가로 받았으며, 2013. 10. 26. 피고 병원에서 퇴원하였다. 다. 원고의 현 상태 1) 원고의 복부는 현재 울퉁불퉁하고 움푹 팬 곳이 있으며, 하복부에 전장 42cm 의 반흔이 존재한다.

In addition, the 100s are biased to the right, and there is a bitle around it.

2) The Plaintiff’s neglect is a situation where multiple strings are spreading. The upper strings are in a state where the upper strings are cut, and the upper strings are in a non-fixed form, and there exists a reflectr that has a string form around the wheels. 3) The Plaintiff’s completion is a state where the inner strings are cut and increased.

[Evidence] Facts without dispute, entry of No. 4 in this Court.

arrow