1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the part of “1. Basic Facts” is the same as the part of “1. Basic Facts” in the grounds for the judgment of the first instance except for the second instance court’s dismissal of the part of the part of the Court of First Instance 8 at the bottom of the third instance. As such, it shall be cited by the text of

2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation in this part is as follows, and the same part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as “2. The occurrence of damages liability” is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

In light of the following circumstances, the part 6 to 5 of the 4th 6th 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth 8, and the result of the first eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth.

§ 1-C. Accordingly,

Since the present situation of the plaintiff was caused by this paragraph, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff.

① In the process of re-locationing a ductal ductal duct, the ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal.