The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 12, 2006, the Plaintiff was specially employed as an emergency medical service worker of Gyeonggi-do fire-fighting officers, and served as the B fire officer on January 13, 201, who was transferred to C fire-fighting units on November 13, 201 and served as the 119 emergency medical service team leader from November 20, 201 to September 21, 2018. On September 9, 2019, the Plaintiff served as the 119 emergency medical service worker of the 119 emergency medical service team.

B. On October 8, 2019, the Defendant issued a three-month disposition of suspension from office against the Plaintiff on the grounds of the following disciplinary reasons (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

From March 2, 2018 to August 19, 2019, the Plaintiff, while serving as the highest elected among the members on board of an ambulances, was not in operation for about 15 months on the 29th working day without any special reason, was in operation for a total of 64 out of 64 units of the first-aid vehicle. From March 2, 2018 to July 2018, the Plaintiff was required to dispatch the first-aid vehicle with the substitute manpower for about 4 months from March 2, 2018. However, despite the on-site experience, the Plaintiff was required to dispatch only the substitute personnel with insufficient on-site experience.

On June 19, 2019, the Plaintiff delayed the dispatch by promptly sending a weekly worker on the ground of the temporary retirement of 09:05 E first-aid vehicles at 08:05 E first-aid service, and the Plaintiff did not dispatch.

In addition, there is a fact that 13 times in total and 78,000 won in the amount have been unjustly received the dispatch allowances and additional charges.

Although the first responder is required to immediately dispatch to the scene and perform fire-fighting activities in good faith, he/she neglected to perform his/her duties as an on-site first-aid worker, such as the failure of first-aid operation and the receipt of additional charges for dispatch allowances and additional charges, and it is judged that he/she failed to comply with the duties of transferring patients and medical

The plaintiff shall maintain dignity as a fire-fighting official, who protects the lives and property of all citizens, on the basis of high level of compliance and morality, and shall be exemplary in public and private affairs, and the duty of good faith shall be public officials.