logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.08.22 2014고단961
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 5, 2012, the Defendant sentenced the Seoul Northern District Court to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. on December 5, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 26, 2013 by the Chuncheon Prison.

"2014 Highest 961"

1. On April 5, 2014, around 08:30 on April 5, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 45 minutes, such as: (a) the convenience store for the victim’s D operation in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) the victim’s sound under the influence of alcohol and preventing customers from entering the said store; and (c) the victim’s convenience store business.

"2014 Highest 1763"

2. On April 4, 2014, at around 13:00, the Defendant heard the victim’s words “whether or not he paid other credit rating” from the victim at the bed o point operated by the victim H (the age of 67) located in the G market located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul. The Defendant took a bath to the victim at the large interest of “the victim interfered with the remaining days after he was known to the Republic of Korea.” The Defendant took a look at the victim at the victim’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’s o’

"2014 Highest 2039"

3. On March 7, 2014, around 13:07, the Defendant: (a) called the Defendant’s house located in C, Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, on the phone of the police officer; (b) made a false report on the Defendant’s request for a police officer’s dispatch by phone call at 112, in the absence of any special reason to request a police officer’s dispatch; and (c) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer’s dispatch of the 112 report by fraudulent means from March 23:13, 2014, by having K and one other, dispatched to the scene; and (d) interfered with the police officer’s lawful execution of duties concerning the dispatch of the 112 report by means of fraudulent means, such as the list of crimes in attached Form No. 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Each statement of L, H, M, N,O, P, Q, R,K, S, T, U, and V;

1. An investigation report (to hear D statements of the business owner at E convenience point) 1.

arrow