beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of disposition;
A. On November 21, 2003, the Plaintiff is a fire-fighting officer who was appointed as a local fire-fighting officer on November 21, 2003 and served as a local fire-fighting officer on January 1, 2015, and thereafter, from January 28, 2019 to the field response team.
B. On December 28, 2018, while serving in the C Fire Fighting Division, the Plaintiff was subject to the previous summary disposition from the public prosecutor belonging to the Changwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office at the Changwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office on the following facts. around June 29, 2018, the Defendant publicly announced that “The Defendant was 15 years old and 15 years old and hereinafter referred to as “victim”) of F’s drinking tobacco or sexual intercourse with male-gu, etc., even though he did not have any knowledge that the victim would have done so, the Defendant was 15 years old, I (Seoul, 16 years old, and 16 years old), and J (Nam, and 16) that “The victim would have been under the duty of self-fighting and fire fighting and fire fighting and fire fighting, so that the victim would have been under the duty of self-fighting and fire fighting, and that the Defendant would have damaged the victim’s reputation by publicly 281, 2019.”
3) On January 24, 2019, the C Fire Captain Disciplinary Committee resolved a reprimand against the Plaintiff on disciplinary action against the Plaintiff. In accordance with the above resolution, the C Fire Station chief made a reprimand against the Plaintiff on January 28, 2019 (hereinafter “instant disposition”). On January 28, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a request for review of the appeal against the instant disposition, but the C Fire Station chief dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for review on May 8, 2019.
C. On February 20, 2019, the Plaintiff issued a summary order of KRW 1 million with the Changwon District Court 2018 High Court 2018 High School Branch 858, and requested formal trial. However, on May 22, 2019, the said court convicted the Plaintiff of a fine of KRW 1 million.