A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 28, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving, driven Done Star Bosch Rexroth without obtaining a driver’s license in the three-meter section near the office of the Defendant, located in C in the following cities: 12:30 on February 28, 2017.

2. The defendant has driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and smelling on the face of the defendant, from the slopeF belonging to the Donsan Police Station E box called up after having received a report at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and having been called up after having received a report.

There are reasonable grounds to determine a seal, and it was demanded from around 13:06 to around 13:36 on the same day to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting four minutes into a drinking measuring instrument for about four occasions.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to put the part of a drinking measuring instrument into a drinking measuring instrument, and failed to comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

3. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and at the same time and place, refused to present an identification card by the F, and was demanded to present an identification card, and the name and resident registration number of G, who was the birth of the Defendant who was aware of his/her identity, was unlawfully used by the said police officer, as if he/she was his/her personal information.

4. The Defendant forged a private document or exercised the said investigation document, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, stated that the part concerning the confirmation of the driver of the said report is “G” in the column for the part concerning the confirmation of the driver of the said report, which was demanded by the police officer F to prepare the driver’s circumstantial statement from the said police officer F at the same time and place, and issued the said police officer as if he was aware of the fact.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and held a copy of the State driver’s circumstantial statement report under the above G, which is a private document on the proof of facts.

5. The date and time specified in paragraph 1 shall be the date and time of the event, such as electronic records, and electronic records of the above author.