1. The Defendant’s KRW 60,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual interest from December 11, 2014 to October 15, 2015, and the following.

1. The Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion has lent a total of KRW 65 million to the Defendant over several occasions over 2012, and KRW 85 million around November 2013. As such, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff KRW 85 million and delay damages.

2. Facts without any dispute as to the cause of the claim, Gap evidence 1-1-3 [No dispute over the part on the defendant's signature, and the authenticity of the document is presumed to have been established. The defendant asserts to the effect that the plaintiff added the requester to the bottom of each document without any authority to the plaintiff. Private document is presumed to have been authentic when the signature, seal or seal of the principal or his agent was affixed. Thus, in a case where the author of the private document recognizes that he himself has signed, sealed, or affixed a seal on the private document in question, unless there are other special circumstances, the document is presumed to have signed, sealed, and affixed such signature, seal, and affixed a seal on 200 won under the completion of the entire document, and there is no evidence that the author first signed and sealed the document only when the whole or part of the document was completely signed and sealed, and there is no reasonable ground to support the presumption of authenticity as a complete document, and there is no evidence from the defendant's 201-20100,000 won for a period of 20 months, 201-10,00,031.