logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.16 2015나26815
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

A. The reasons for the entry in this case are as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and this is also cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. From 5th to 7th day of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “A evidence (each document is presumed to have been authentic in its entire document due to the lack of dispute over the part signed by the defendant, and the defendant has no evidence to acknowledge it)” means evidence Nos. 3 [No dispute exists with the part signed by the plaintiff, and since the defendant did not state “A separate document” at the time when the document was signed with the evidence No. 3, the corresponding part was altered. However, the private document is presumed to have been authentic in its signature, seal, or seal affixed by the principal or his agent. In other cases where the author of the private document recognizes the formation of the portion signed, sealed, or affixed a seal on the private document, barring any special circumstances, the document is presumed to have been authentic in its entire document, and the document is presumed to have been authentic in its entire document’s signature, seal, or signature and seal affixed by the plaintiff, etc., and the defendant is presumed to have been 190 if it is deemed that there is no other special circumstance.

arrow