Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around December 19, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (accidents, Violence, etc.) committed assault on the victim’s head while driving a motor vehicle by stating that the victim C (50 years of age) was aboard a D taxi operated by the victim C (50 years of age) in the rear part of B of the Busan East-gu, Busan East-gu, and, at the same time, he fell into the inner intersection road located in the hot spring dong-gu, Busan, and without any justifiable reason, he saw the victim’s head on two occasions, and she was driving a motor vehicle by breaking the shoulder.

2. On December 19, 2012, around 22:30 on December 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) unloaded from the said taxi in front of the instant apartment in Busan Eastdong-gu, Busan; (b) opened a driver’s seat; and (c) opened the cryp to the victim C; and (d) was sprinked by sprinking the flap of the victim; and (c) was sprinked by drinking the victim’s face one time.

3. On December 19, 2012, around 22:30 on December 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the Victim C in front of the He apartment in Busan Eastdong-gu, Busan; and (b) destroyed the property to take the back of the said Duneteta taxi with the backer of the said Dunta taxi, thereby damaging the said taxi in an amount equivalent to KRW 198,00 in repairing cost.

4. On December 19, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, around 22:30, in front of the Ma apartment, Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan, the Defendant obstructed the legitimate execution of duties of the above G as to the suppression and investigation of the crime by blocking the Defendant and arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and by checking three times the body length of the above G as a drinking.

5. Defluence;

A. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 4, listened to 10 persons, and the victim G and security guards belonging to the F Zone Group of the same Police Station, who were to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender and to proceed to the F Zone as the Defendant, did not constitute “the victims of the defect, who are deemed to have been subject to the tax withholding and assessment of tax base, e.g., e., e., the e.,

. Ham Hamp Hambs, these police officers.